Prediction of Igor Sijsling vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
I. Sijsling vs D. Gimeno-Traver

Igor Sijsling

NED

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

6'0" (183 cm)

854

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$716.2K

Career Money

$1.1M

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Daniel Gimeno-Traver

ESP

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

6'0" (183 cm)

854

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$716.2K

Career Money

$1.1M

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Sijsling 2 - 0 Gimeno-Traver

They have played 5 sets in total, with Igor Sijsling winning 5 and Daniel Gimeno-Traver winning 0. The last match between Igor Sijsling and Daniel Gimeno-Traver was at the Amersfoort Challenger, 19-07-2019, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Igor Sijsling getting the victory 6-3 7-5.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Sijsling	2
Gimeno-Traver	0

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(QF) Amersfoort Challenger(07-19-19)

Stats

Igor Sijsling

Daniel Gimeno-Traver

(R1) U.S. Open - New York(08-29-12)

Stats

Igor Sijsling

Daniel Gimeno-Traver

I. Sijsling vs D. Gimeno-Traver H2H Profile

I. Sijsling	Stats	D. Gimeno-Traver
$716,195	Career Prize Money	$1,102,200
57.65% (524-385)	Career Total W/L	56.61% (625-479)
1	Clay	0
1	Hard	0
20	Titles	24
2	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

I. Sijsling vs D. Gimeno-Traver Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Igor Sijsling has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Daniel Gimeno-Traver has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Igor Sijsling, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Daniel Gimeno-Traver has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Igor Sijsling has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Daniel Gimeno-Traver has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Igor Sijsling has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Daniel Gimeno-Traver winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Igor Sijsling has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 165/104), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 52% (W/L 31/29). Daniel Gimeno-Traver has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 578/369), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 21% (W/L 6/22).
Player level: In the last year, Igor Sijsling has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Daniel Gimeno-Traver has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Igor Sijsling winning 2 times and Daniel Gimeno-Traver being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Igor Sijsling winning 5 and Daniel Gimeno-Traver winning 0.
The last match between Igor Sijsling and Daniel Gimeno-Traver was at the Amersfoort Challenger, 19-07-2019, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Igor Sijsling getting the victory 6-3 7-5.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:33:36.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Igor Sijsling has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Daniel Gimeno-Traver has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Igor Sijsling has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Daniel Gimeno-Traver has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Igor Sijsling has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Daniel Gimeno-Traver has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Igor Sijsling vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

I. Sijsling vs D. Gimeno-Traver H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

I. Sijsling	Stats	D. Gimeno-Traver
2	H2H Matches Won	0
5	Sets Won	0
32	Games Won	20
12	Aces (Total)	6
4	Total Double Faults	8
1:33:36	Average Match Time	1:33:36
69% (111/162)	1st Serve %	47% (71/152)
68% (76/111)	1st Serve Win %	66% (47/71)
57% (29/51)	2nd Serve Win %	49% (40/81)
47% (9/19)	Break Pts Won %	36% (4/11)
42% (65/154)	Return Points Win %	35% (57/163)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑5 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (2/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/2)

Recent Performance Stats

I. Sijsling Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Mallorca Challenger - 28-08-2023
Q1 Kenny de SchepperK. de	L	4-6 7-6(2) 6-1	Stats
Lisbon Challenger - 27-09-2021
R1 Andrea PellegrinoA. Pellegrino	L	6-0 6-4	Stats
Braga Challenger - 20-09-2021
R1 Michael VrbenskyM. Vrbensky	L	6-1 6-4	Stats
Prague 3 Challenger - 23-08-2021
SF Franco AgamenoneF. Agamenone	L	6-3 6-0	Stats
QF Kaichi UchidaK. Uchida	W	7-5 6-3	Stats

View All

D. Gimeno-Traver Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Barcelona Challenger - 04-10-2021
Q1 Oleksii KrutykhO. Krutykh	L	6-2 6-0	Stats
Oeiras 3 Challenger - 17-05-2021
Q1 Ernests GulbisE. Gulbis	L	6-1 6-1	Stats
Barcelona Challenger - 30-09-2019
R1 Javier Barranco CosanoJ. Barranco	L	6-3 6-0	Stats
Florence Challenger - 23-09-2019
R1 Mario Vilella MartinezM. Vilella	L	7-6(1) 6-2	Stats
Biella Challenger - 16-09-2019
R1 Viktor GalovicV. Galovic	L	6-3 7-5	Stats

View All

I. Sijsling vs D. Gimeno-Traver Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

I. Sijsling	Stats	D. Gimeno-Traver
57.65% (524/385)	YTD Win/Loss	56.61% (625/479)
56.74% (1208/921)	Sets Win/Loss	54.44% (1415/1184)
52.49% (10742/9721)	Games Win/Loss	51.91% (12975/12022)
53.27% (114/100)	Hard Win/Loss	34.12% (29/56)
55.10% (162/132)	Clay Win/Loss	61.03% (578/369)
63.64% (217/124)	Indoor Hard W/L	27.27% (12/32)
51.67% (31/29)	Grass Win/Loss	21.43% (6/22)
0.34	Aces Per Game	0.22
3436	Aces Total	2684
0.13	Double Faults Per Game	0.18
1261	Total Double Faults	2209
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
584.88	Average Opponent Rank	599.53
59% (24753/41711)	1st Serve %	59% (29576/49868)
74% (18199/24753)	1st Serve Win %	70% (20559/29576)
50% (8477/16958)	2nd Serve Win %	50% (10099/20308)
42% (1644/3877)	Break Points Won % (Total)	42% (2075/4983)
38% (16242/42222)	Return Points Win %	39% (19916/50722)
53.23% (33/29)	Slam W/L	29.82% (17/40)
48.15% (13/14)	Masters W/L	46.27% (31/36)
42.86% (3/4)	Cups W/L	33.33% (2/4)
43.97% (62/79)	Main Tour W/L	46.82% (140/159)
55.47% (218/175)	Challenger W/L	61.03% (343/219)
69.89% (195/84)	Futures W/L	81.42% (92/21)
59% (501/854)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	58% (605/1050)
39% (14/36)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	28% (11/40)
54% (185/344)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	47% (175/372)
48% (136/284)	Deciding Set Win %	55% (196/355)
83% (535/445)	1st Set Won, Won Match	87% (597/521)
17% (535/89)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	12% (597/73)
21% (373/78)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	20% (505/100)